A security robot has been hired to monitor a Texas airport's doors and looks more than a little miffed about the whole ordeal

When we imagine robots, our minds often go towards a sci-fi future in which our world, or perhaps even the worlds beyond it, are populated with fantastical machines performing fantastical tasks. However, the reality in 2024 is a little more down to Earth. Spare a thought then for this particular model of machine, as rather than ushering in a new dawn of technological revolution, it's instead been hired by San Antonio airport to stand near some doors.

The model in question is one of Knightscope's K5 autonomous security robots, and it's a fairly impressive tower of authoritarian power (via The Guardian). Weighing in at 420lb and standing at just over five feet tall, the robot is designed for outdoor or indoor use, primarily in a security capacity. And San Antonio city council has just approved a year long contract to rent one as an airport security measure. 

Before you imagine the machine checking your bags and making sure you take your shoes off before you go through the scanner however, think again. Robbie (can I call you Robbie? I shall regardless) has instead been brought in for the purpose of operating near doors with frequently activated alarms.

If a door alarm is set-off, Robbie will wheel himself over to the location of the disturbance and take a photo of the individual that activated the alarm and send that information to the airport command centre, so that they might identify whether its simply a member of staff attempting to access a required area, or a ne'er-do-well up to no good.

Bit of a downgrade from furthering the potential of mankind, but hey, someone's got to do it. Given that frowning, Cylon-like front aperture, it doesn't look like the robot is too pleased about the new beat, although in this case it would not be alone.

Best gaming PC: The top pre-built machines.
Best gaming laptop: Great devices for mobile gaming.

San Antonio council member Jalen McKee-Rodriguez voted against the contract, among others, objecting to surveillance concerns, while