Snapdragon X Elite Running In The Snapdragon Dev Kit Can Reach A Power Draw Of Up To 102W With Cinebench 2024 Fired Up

The Snapdragon Dev Kit was introduced by Qualcomm for developers at a price of $899, and it featured the company’s top-end silicon for Windows-powered machines, the Snapdragon X Elite. Given that the chipset takes advantage of processing cores based on ARM’s instruction sets and not the x86 architecture, power-efficiency would be its forte. Unfortunately, the Snapdragon X Elite displays extreme power-guzzling attributes when running inside the kit, as one developer points out when running a couple of tests, including Cinebench 2024.

Since Cinebench 2024 hammers the CPU, it was obvious that the Snapdragon X Elite would reach a higher power draw while running in the Snapdragon Dev Kit

Given that the Snapdragon Dev Kit is not a mobile machine and cannot function while being carried around, it would make sense for Qualcomm to let the Snapdragon X Elite operate at full tilt so developers gain access to the chipset’s entire performance envelope. Jeff Geerling, a developer, noticed this behavior when firing up Geekbench 6 and Cinebench 2024. The first benchmark revealed that the Snapdragon X Elite’s power draw was 80W, which is an acceptable range.

Related Story Apple Updates Its M3 MacBook Air Marketing Material, Claims It Is Up To 40 Percent Faster Than Copilot+ PCs Featuring The Snapdragon X Elite

However, things take a different turn when running Cinebench 2024, as Geerling reports that the power draw was in the 99W-102W range. During the end of the benchmarking test, the Snapdragon X Elite obtained a single-core and multi-core score of 131 and 1,227. These figures show that the SoC can sip power like there is no tomorrow, but Geerling believes that Qualcomm might have deliberately done this so that the chipset can run at its maximum capabilities, giving developers full advantage of the hardware.

It is unlikely that the same Snapdragon X Elite running in ‘thin and light’ Windows notebooks would exhibit the same power consumption metrics as Qualcomm’s partners would